Undermining Fredrikstad City Council: Police Shield Unanimously Expelled Candidate and Freeze Criminal Files for Personal Interests
Digital Evidence Unmasks Police Complicity: How Law Enforcement Reinstated the Offender Post-Expulsion from Council and the Socialist Left Party (SV) to Grant Immunity and Cover Up Cybercrimes, Extortion, and Hate Speech
02.08.2026
Updated: 20.08.2026
From the "London Stage" to the Shield of "Victimhood" and Institutional Exploitation
In criminology and the psychological analysis of fraudsters, when a perpetrator's masks slip and his administrative covers collapse, he routinely resort to activating a mechanism known as the "Mask of Sanity." This behavioral maneuver aims to project the image of an "honorable citizen" and a targeted victim, creating a compensatory facade to obscure the parallel cyber and financial crimes operated in the shadows.
However, the recent statement published by the perpetrator (the expelled candidate) on his personal website a platform constructed primarily as a vehicle for fraud and a tool for facts manipulation using fabricated media failed to achieve its objective. Driven by panic and confusion, it inadvertently transformed into Self-Incriminating Material Evidence.
The perpetrator fell directly into a classic behavioral pattern known in forensic science as "Offender Errors." His desperate attempts to erase his digital footprint triggered a series of physical contradictions that completely unraveled his narrative, exposing the explicit procedural complicity of the Fredrikstad Police, who provided him with coverage for years.
Confrontation with Digital Evidence: Dismantling the Fraudulent Platform’s Falsehoods
Stage One: The Collapse of the Travel Narrative and the Failure of "Geographic Deception"
The Travel Claim (Fake Heathrow Airport Post):
"Ankommet London... Forsinkelse på 20 minutter og enormt kaos på Heathrow Terminal 5."
("Arrived in London... A 20-minute delay and extreme chaos at Heathrow .")
The Conflicting Written Admission (From his fraudulent website):
"Blant de siste usanne påstandene hevdes det blant annet at jeg har... forlatt Norge. Disse påstandene er fullstendig uriktige."
("Among the latest false claims, it is alleged that I have... left Norway. These claims are completely untrue!")
Forensic Analysis of the Narrative:
The perpetrator deliberately engaged in what cybercrime analysis categorizes as "Intentional Geographic Deception."He published recycled photographs and fabricated arrival data to construct a "Simulated Virtual Crime Scene,"attempting to wrap himself in perceived territorial immunity to execute remote blackmail operations.
However, under the weight of panic regarding his digital footprint, he reverted to explicitly acknowledging that the departure post was nothing more than false testimony and a fraudulent maneuver.
What makes this forensically alarming is that the Fredrikstad Police did not merely fail to verify this simulated crime scene; they actively adopted the false narrative, using the pretended foreign presence as a convenient procedural pretext to justify their total inaction and avoid opening a formal investigation.
This documented photograph, published on July 5, 2026, constitutes physical forensic evidence of intentional deception and the fabrication of a simulated crime scene. The perpetrator (the expelled candidate) deliberately published theatrical, false details regarding a "flight delay and congestion at Heathrow Airport" to deceive everyone into believing he had absconded to London, thereby attempting to secure assumed territorial immunity to continue his cybercrimes.
However, the perpetrator fell directly into the trap of decisive criminal contradiction and self-incrimination when he panicked and returned via his fake website to completely deny leaving the country, stating: "Disse påstandene er fullstendig uriktige" ("These claims are completely untrue!").
This blatant contradiction eliminates all doubt and conclusively proves that the July 5 "Heathrow Airport" post was nothing more than false testimony and a fraudulent maneuver. What makes this forensically alarming is that the Fredrikstad Police did not merely fail to verify this simulated crime scene; they actively adopted the false narrative, using his pretended foreign presence as a convenient procedural pretext to justify their total inaction and avoid opening a formal investigation.
Stage Two: Preemptive Denial and Institutional Shielding via Police Collusion
Digital Repudiation Claim:
"Som offentlig person er jeg kjent med at det finnes... falske profiler... Jeg tar derfor tydelig avstand fra alt innhold..."
("As a public figure, I am aware that false profiles exist... I therefore clearly disassociate myself from all content published through these profiles...")
Claim of Political Standing and Immunity:
"Jeg er en offentlig person og vararepresentant i Fredrikstad kommunestyre..."
("I am a public figure and a deputy representative in Fredrikstad Municipal Council...")
Forensic Evidence vs. Documented Reality of the "Police Deal":
The Forensic Digital Footprint: The disclaimer statement emerged immediately after a documented call on July 7, 2026, between the complicit officer and the perpetrator, right after the failed attempt to blackmail the journalist. The perpetrator precipitously altered account identifiers to erase evidence.
Documented Institutional Reality & Police Intervention: Official records confirm the perpetrator was unanimously expelled on June 21, 2026, following written confessions of digital espionage, hacking, extortion, and targeted intimidation. However, the municipality subsequently capitulated and reinstated his position following direct police intervention and procedural leverage, effectively enabling him to weaponize institutional coverage.
Integrated Forensic Analysis:
The perpetrator’s strategy fuses two severe criminal elements:
Preemptive Denial & Anti-Forensics: A defensive maneuver activated upon recognizing that his digital footprint had been fully documented, attempting to sever his real identity from his cybercrime infrastructure.
Institutional Coercion & Law Enforcement Collusion: By exploiting direct police pressure on local authorities to force his reinstatement post-expulsion, the expelled candidate leveraged this coerced status to shield himself from prosecution, relying on the complicit police prosecutor to downplay severe cybercrimes into mere "personal disputes."
These documented records constitute conclusive self-incriminating evidence. On the very account he subsequently sought to deny, the perpetrator explicitly acknowledged that all members of the municipal council, including representatives of his own political faction, voted unanimously to suspend him and terminate his duties as an alternate council member.
Furthermore, these admissions expose his swift attempts to demand the removal of the press report published in VG regarding his expulsion, aiming to quickly contain the decision and avoid a public scandal.
The stark contradiction between this explicit admission of institutional expulsion and his subsequent denial published on his fraudulent website illustrates a recognized pattern in forensic criminology termed 'Offender Errors.' Driven by panic over the collapse of his institutional standing which he originally acquired through forged birth data the perpetrator attempted to fabricate a victimhood narrative and pose as the victim. He persisted in his deception, pretending to be the aggrieved party while illegally impersonating a political title from which he was officially stripped on June 21, 2026, before being illegally reinstated in July 2026 through the direct intervention and backing of corrupt local police officers.
Stage Three: Preemptive Anti-Forensic Maneuver: Renunciation of Iraqi Citizenship to Evade Deportation and Extradition
The perpetrator’s tactical progression exposes a precalculated, panic-driven scheme designed to establish a "false procedural shield and loophole." Anticipating the inevitable collapse of his local protective shield and expecting that his documented criminal activities would trigger mandatory deportation or extradition under cross-border tracking warrants upon arrest, the expelled candidate proactively initiated procedures to renounce his native Iraqi citizenship.
This step was no mere administrative routine; it constituted a calculated forensic maneuver aimed at exploiting legal loopholes surrounding "statelessness" (Statelessness Fraud). Operating under the legal fallacy that relinquishing his native Iraqi citizenship would obstruct cross-border prosecution and extradition, and fearing that physical exposure would lead to immediate deportation, he shifted his criminal infrastructure entirely into cyberspace weaponizing the internet for remote extortion, cyber-espionage, and harassment while relying on the statelessness loophole to obstruct potential deportation or removal orders should his criminal dossier reach the judiciary.
The "Family Victimhood" Shield: Utilizing Family as a Criminal Front and Fraud Network
The perpetrator repeatedly resorts to the emotional rhetoric: "My family and I are victims of injustice and defamation."However, physical evidence and records of malicious criminal cases expose a fully integrated criminal pattern where the family is deployed as a front and coverage for fraud and extortion:
Fabrication of Criminal Cases & Exploitation of Wife and Daughter (2014–2016):
Documented records reveal that following his legal defeat in 2016 in the fabricated "attempted murder" case which he orchestrated in collaboration with his wife and police prosecutor Hege Finsveen, using their daughter as a false witness the perpetrator attempted to circumvent the final judicial ruling and erase the truth despite a complete judicial acquittal, relying on ongoing protection and shielding from complicit elements within the Fredrikstad police.
Malicious Reporting & Exploitation of Wife’s Name in Financial Embezzlement:
Official files demonstrate his wife's active involvement in filing malicious reports and posing as an "injured victim" before judicial bodies. Furthermore, the perpetrator directly weaponized her name to execute documented fraud and financial embezzlement schemes targeting the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV). Consequently, the police placed him under surveillance until the funds were returned and the case was quietly closed."
Fabrication of Wealth & Fake Qualifications to Cover Bankruptcy:
The perpetrator engaged in systemic societal deception, asserting ownership of real estate valued at 5,5 million NOK, claiming intentions to purchase an apartment in London, and documenting searches for high-end properties in Norwegian cities, alongside falsely impersonating professional titles (such as an engineer). In contrast, official financial registries verify that his commercial record contains zero active projects (zero balance), proving that these claims were merely attempts to obscure his criminal antecedents, unlawful background, and bankrupt reality.
Forensic Conclusion:
Concealing activities under "family victimization" is merely a defensive tactic to generate misleading public sympathy. Documented legal evidence confirms that the perpetrator and his wife operate an integrated criminal network characterized by a division of illegal roles and official malicious filings, compounding his documented background in cross-border human smuggling networks.
These official files and registries constitute procedural evidence refuting claims of "victim status," while substantiating indications of criminal complicity between the primary actor and his spouse. Official documentation confirms the structural use of the spouse's legal identity to submit malicious reports and facilitate financial transactions subject to documented fraud investigations.
The systematic involvement of family members including reliance on a minor’s testimony that was judicially invalidated in prior proceedings meets the criteria for assessing a functional division of criminal roles. This removes the pretext of "family victimization" and establishes the records as evidence of a documented pattern of joint conduct.
To follow the detailed chronological timeline and documented case archives:
Click here to access the full investigation and documented evidence
This final acquittal ruling stands as definitive proof dismantling the accusations, establishing through official records that the case was merely a malicious and fabricated report entirely rejected by the court.
Furthermore, documentation exposes a renewed attempt by the expelled member and his spouse to initiate a new wave of fraud and deception backed by collusion from the same local police elements to stage a false narrative of "victimhood" and exploit fabricated claims for public and legal leverage.
The Objective Truth and Conclusive Legal Comparison:
The unanimous vote to expel the member was not merely an administrative procedure; it was the earthquake that stripped the perpetrator of his political shields and tore off his mask exposing his true nature and habitual criminal tendencies, which he desperately tried to cover up, along with his criminal past, by infiltrating political work and running for public office.
Immediately following his expulsion and upon being confronted with irrefutable physical evidence, his behavioral and moral degradation was exposed in its worst form. He instantly shifted from a state of concealed immunity to the overt commission of a series of criminal acts, including blackmail, hacking, direct threats, and the dissemination of hate speech, sectarianism, and racism. These were followed by flagrant attacks on personal honor and reputations,targeting the integrity of blameless individuals and families. In doing so, he dragged public discourse into a mire of vulgar insinuations, derogatory expressions, and primitive racial rhetoric—a behavioral regression revealing an intellectually deficient and morally bankrupt mindset, attempting to compensate for an ingrained inferiority complex and a collapsing sense of self-worth through artificial posturing and chauvinism. These verbal and behavioral aberrations prove that we are not dealing with a political opponent, but rather with a morally compromised individual attempting to repair his internal psychological deformities by defaming honor and blatantly violating human dignity.
The perpetrator had previously used his seat on the municipal council which he attained through forgery, his role in the Socialist Left Party (SV), and his participation in the "Dialogue Forum" merely as a shield and cover for his unlawful conduct in an attempt to legitimize his presence. However, the subsequent intervention by the Fredrikstad Police District to reintegrate him through suspicious arrangements was nothing more than an extension of an established institutional practice: shielding him from accountability and freezing investigative files regarding his local and international crimes to evade legal enforcement and protect him from taking responsibility.
Relying on the professional conscience of law enforcement authorities currently defending their procedural arrogance to save face has proven futile against this criminal network. Documented evidence (comprising over 120 public statements) reveals a dangerous behavioral pattern spanning account hacking, cyber-blackmail, harassment, threats, blatant racial discrimination, and sectarian hate speech (as demonstrated by his public posts disparaging entire communities and minority lineages). Tolerance of these overt violations demonstrates that committing crimes in Norway carries no consequences as long as networks of influence and personal connections with individuals inside the police department exist. Furthermore, the Fredrikstad police’s blatant insistence on ignoring physical evidence and granting immunity to the perpetrator exposes a system prioritizing the protection of complicit officers over procedural integrity and the rule of law. This approach points to a selective application of legal provisions; where the law is weaponized against specific parties while proceedings are suspended to afford immunity to others, reflecting a breakdown in procedural integrity and stripping the rule of law of its core essence amidst systemic favoritism
An analysis of these facts under the standards of international criminal law (including international conventions against organized crime, cyber-extortion, document forgery, and treaties prohibiting racial discrimination and hate speech) leads to a decisive conclusion: had even half of this documented physical evidence been handled by a police force with genuine investigative integrity and law enforcement authorities committed to strict equality before the law, the perpetrator would currently be serving a heavy prison sentence on charges of extortion, fraud, cyber-espionage, electoral fraud, human trafficking, incitement to racial and sectarian hatred, and inflicting severe, intentional harm on citizens and individuals.
The continuation of his immunity and his ongoing operations of fraud and defamation reflect nothing less than a tragic institutional reality that prioritized nepotism over accountability, registering a historic failure before international justice.
Screenshot from the official website of Fredrikstad Municipality
Compelling evidence and documentation prove that the decision to reinstate the candidate was merely a fragile administrative facade, concealing blatant collusion and a web of mutual interests between corrupt security officers and the perpetrator. Swiftly acting to subvert the course of law in favor of favoritism rather than the rule of justice, these officers systematically suppressed his extensive record of criminal and cyber violations, actively shielding him from scrutiny to forcibly impose his reinstatement in defiance of his unanimous expulsion by all political factions.
In this context, and strictly presenting the administrative side, the municipal administration via its Communications Advisor, Atle Kjøge Jansson issued a brief statement that did not address the material evidence provided regarding cybercrimes, account hacking, and third-party espionage. This response comes despite the municipality having received a fully documented and translated dossier containing explicit admissions made by the member himself prior to altering his handles and purging his name, photos, admissions, and leaks wherein he confessed to unlawfully obtaining data and official correspondence between municipalities, ministries, and the journalist, alongside public threats of harm, revenge, and hate speech. This is in addition to his acknowledged unanimous expulsion by all political factions on June 21, 2026, and the retraction of the report regarding his expulsion from the newspaper VG just 15 minutes after publication.
The official response issued by the municipality read as follows:
"Hello! We can confirm that Salah Hassan Al-Saadi was elected as a deputy member of the Fredrikstad Municipal Council (Bystyret) for the period 2023–2027. He is also a deputy member of the Health Committee (Helseutvalget) and the Planning Committee (Planutvalget). This status remains valid today. Furthermore, we have no further comments regarding this matter.
Kind regards,
Atle Kjøge Jansson Communications Advisor, Fredrikstad Municipality"
This response outlines the municipality's official administrative stance, while the attached documentation and verified confessions raise grave questions regarding police corruption and the illicit protection granted to this candidate.
Today, the institutional and moral breakdown reaches its peak. Fueled by personal connections and procedural immunity afforded by complicit police elements, this individual resumes his seat among council members, effectively bypassing his documented criminal record and ongoing offenses. Granting this individual indirect access to municipal systems and records poses a direct threat to the privacy and personal data security of citizens, leaving the public vulnerable to illegal espionage, unauthorized access, and data exploitation a risk that is no longer theoretical, but an established reality substantiated by documented confessions and decisive digital evidence. As confirmed by the official statements of the municipal communications advisor, his formal reinstatement to a seat from which he was unanimously expelled serves as explicit institutional validation of these infractions. The presence of a documented offender exercising official functions under institutional cover does not erase the physical evidence of his crimes; rather, it solidifies an undisputed record of a system prioritizing cronyism over integrity and the rule of law.
Every elected member in this chamber has officially received, via direct email, the forensic dossier documenting the criminal activities of the expelled member.
The dossier documents a systematic pattern of extortion, executed with the direct support and facilitation of corrupt police elements who handed case documents over to the perpetrator from the very first day of obtaining them. Rather than enforcing the law, police authorities deliberately refrained from conducting any investigation, dismissing the case from the outset under various unfounded pretexts. The evidence points to an active cover-up to shield these criminal activities, driven by a shared interest in suppressing publication and withholding these facts from both the judiciary and the public, including the documented and published 2014 case. This criminal behavior was further consolidated through a failed extortion attempt to halt publication, carried out by the perpetrator himself who possesses an extensive criminal record and is involved in human smuggling, embezzlement, and falsifying his date of birth to secure a municipal council seat via account hacking, interception of official inter-municipal communications, and unauthorized surveillance of third-party accounts, supported by documented confessions under his name and details disclosed by him that matched official communications from Norwegian municipalities and ministries.
The dossier also documents cybercrime (hacking) and espionage targeting official inter-municipal communications. These are verifiable facts that align with written and explicit confessions made by the candidate himself, under his own name and featuring his picture. Despite these confessions being directly linked to his identity, he chose to deny them in a blatant attempt to evade accountability. This occurred after the police intervened and reinstated him to the Fredrikstad Municipal Council, notwithstanding his unanimous expulsion by all representatives, including the Socialist Left Party (SV). This denial stands in stark contrast to his latest public statements where he claims that he and his family were subjected to "injustice and defamation" cynically and deceptively leveraging the name of the judiciary and the police as a tool to mislead both the Municipal Council and the public.
Additionally, the evidentiary record contains compelling proof of threats, defamation, hate speech, sectarian rhetoric targeting minorities, unauthorized surveillance of third-party digital accounts, and the joint filing of frivolous, malicious lawsuits with his wife (family) lawsuits they lost pursuant to a judicial ruling. This runs parallel to a clear attempt to circumvent a binding court order dated March 19, 2026, by exploiting his status as a deputy council member to contact Google to censor coverage and suppress publication after his network associate failed to do so. This constitutes a direct violation of a formal, signed pledge he personally executed prior to assuming his seat, in which he officially bound himself not to censor journalists or abuse his municipal office to infringe upon freedom of expression. Reviewing this record officially eliminates any claim of plausible deniability; these findings are now an active evidentiary reality in the possession of everyone present in this room.
Reinstating this seat holder who remains subject to solid criminal evidence while operating under a shield of police protection preventing his files from reaching judicial review places this council before a crucial test of its principles and institutional legitimacy. Taking a responsible stance regarding these verified findings is no longer a political option, but a duty that holds every member in this chamber accountable before the electorate. Overlooking these facts risks eroding public trust and directly puts the independence and integrity of this institution to the test.s institution.
Statement Exposing Misleading Claims & Confronting False Narratives:
This public statement represents a direct attempt to mislead public opinion and the community. The perpetrator deliberately disregards a substantial body of physical evidence and documented violations, which were implicitly validated through his own official records.
Despite the unanimous expulsion decision and the ratification by the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget) revoking his official status, he continues to circulate a narrative contrary to official records. This has been facilitated by procedural immunity and ongoing tolerance from elements within the Fredrikstad police, who enabled his reinstatement to the municipal seat from which he was officially removed under binding institutional decisions.
FilesSOSZainab Abdulkarim
